xxxx18hd亚洲hd秘书_www裸玉足久久久_国产性xxxx无遮挡夜色_亚洲精品视频三区_中文字幕欧美一区,在线免费观看日韩av,亚洲乱妇19p,免费看裸体网

律師觀點(diǎn)

肩上擔(dān)山知任重,志存云天砥礪行

涉外實(shí)務(wù)分享 | 混血寶媽遭網(wǎng)暴,訴訟維權(quán)獲法院支持
關(guān)聯(lián)律師:發(fā)布時(shí)間:2024-05-24

 

引言

Introduction

如今數(shù)字化時(shí)代,網(wǎng)絡(luò)成為信息傳播的主要渠道。與此同時(shí),網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)問題也日益凸顯,侵犯他人隱私權(quán)、名譽(yù)權(quán)等合法權(quán)益的現(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生,有些人甚至認(rèn)為在網(wǎng)上罵外籍人士不會(huì)引起侵權(quán)責(zé)任。京師律師代理為混血寶媽在國(guó)內(nèi)維權(quán)獲得廣州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院的支持。由此可見,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界中,無論是誰(shuí),都應(yīng)當(dāng)遵守網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德,無論被侵權(quán)人在國(guó)內(nèi)或者國(guó)內(nèi),尊重他人合法權(quán)益同樣重要。

 

In today's digital age, the internet has become a major medium for information dissemination. Alongside this development, issues of online infringement, such as violations of privacy and reputation rights, have become increasingly visible. Some even believe that insulting foreigners online does not entail legal responsibility. Our firm successfully represented a mom of a mixed-race baby, obtaining support from the Guangzhou Internet Court. This underscores that in the online world, everyone must adhere to ethical standards and respect legal rights, whether the victim is domestically or internationally located.

 

 

案情回顧

Case Review

原告J遠(yuǎn)嫁海外生有一女,混血寶寶因患有顱縫早閉的疾病,為尋醫(yī)原告在國(guó)內(nèi)抖音平臺(tái)上發(fā)布了孩子的照片和視頻。然而,被告B未經(jīng)許可,擅自將J發(fā)布的照片制作成視頻,并在視頻中配以侮辱性的文字和聲音,試圖以J女兒的形象為反面教材,證明混血兒丑陋愚蠢的觀點(diǎn)。此外,被告還在視頻和評(píng)論區(qū)發(fā)表“背叛民族的罪人” 等明顯帶有侮辱性、歧視性質(zhì)的言論,對(duì)J的婚姻及女兒作出負(fù)面的、缺少事實(shí)依據(jù)的評(píng)論,這些行為給J造成了嚴(yán)重的精神損害。在J與其通過抖音后臺(tái)溝通后,被告依然不知悔改,不刪除視頻,J不堪其辱提起訴訟。
 
The plaintiff,J, lives abroad and has a daughter who suffers from craniosynostosis. Seeking medical advice, J shared photos and videos of her daughter on the Chinese platform Douyin. Defendant B, without permission, repurposed J’s photos to produce a video, incorporating insulting text and voice commentary that portrayed J's daughter as a negative example to assert views of mixed-race individuals being unattractive and foolish. Moreover, B posted comments such as "traitor to the nation" , which are clearly insulting and discriminatory. These comments negatively and baselessly criticized J's marriage and daughter, inflicting severe emotional harm on J. Despite attempts to resolve the issue through Douyin’s administrative channels, B refused to delete the video, prompting J to file a lawsuit.
 

 

訴訟過程

Litigation Process

面對(duì)公然的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)和人身攻擊,J作為母親選擇站出來,用法律武器保護(hù)權(quán)益,她委托我所趙寶蓮律師在廣州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院提起訴訟。趙律師建議客戶首先將視頻證據(jù)通過權(quán)利衛(wèi)士取證平臺(tái)進(jìn)行保存,接著向抖音平臺(tái)發(fā)出律師函,要求將相關(guān)侵權(quán)視頻進(jìn)行下架。接著在啟動(dòng)訴訟的過程中, 通過律師調(diào)查令的方式向抖音平臺(tái)的調(diào)取到被告的身份信息及居住信息,將抖音平臺(tái)上中躲在虛擬世界中的鍵盤手拉到前臺(tái),要求他們面對(duì)自己行為造成的后果,最后獲得了令客戶滿意成果。這場(chǎng)維權(quán)的法律斗爭(zhēng)不僅是對(duì)個(gè)人權(quán)益的維護(hù),更是對(duì)所有母親守護(hù)孩子尊嚴(yán)的支持。
 
Confronted with blatant online infringement and personal attacks, J, as a mother, decided to stand up and protect her rights legally. Our lawyer, Zhao Baolian, advised J to first secure the video evidence through the Rights Guardian platform and then sent a legal notice to Douyin demanding the removal of the infringing video. The litigation process involved a court order to obtain B’s personal and residential information from Douyin, exposing the keyboard warrior to the real-world consequences of their online actions. And finally get a satisfactory result for customers.This legal battle was a defense of individual rights and an affirmation of the dignity of all mothers protecting their children.
 

 

案件結(jié)果

Case Outcome

一、被告B于本判決發(fā)生法律效力之日起十日內(nèi),在其抖音賬號(hào)發(fā)布道歉聲明向原告賠禮道歉,道歉內(nèi)容需經(jīng)本院審核,且不得設(shè)置查閱權(quán)限,持續(xù)時(shí)間不少于15日;
二、被告B于本判決發(fā)生法律效力之日起十日內(nèi)向原告支付精神損害賠償10000元;
三、被告B于本判決發(fā)生法律效力之日起十日內(nèi)向原告支付經(jīng)濟(jì)損失(含合理維權(quán)費(fèi)用)5000元。
 
1. Within ten days of the judgment becoming legally effective, defendant B must publish an apology on their Douyin account, subject to court review, which must remain accessible and unaltered for at least 15 days.
2. Within ten days of the judgment becoming legally effective, defendant B must pay J 10,000 yuan for emotional damages.
3. Within ten days of the judgment becoming legally effective, defendant B must pay J 5,000 yuan for economic losses, including reasonable costs of litigation.
 

 

本案焦點(diǎn)難點(diǎn)

Focus and Challenges

本案的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)為被告是否侵害了原告的一般人格權(quán)以及如被告構(gòu)成侵權(quán),應(yīng)如何承擔(dān)民事法律責(zé)任。在審理過程中,律師通過法院訴訟平臺(tái)提交了相關(guān)證據(jù),被告在庭審中充分發(fā)表了質(zhì)證意見。被告還提出他認(rèn)為原告和女兒都是外籍人士,他在網(wǎng)上的言論都是針對(duì)外國(guó)人,中國(guó)法院不應(yīng)該管。法院認(rèn)為,被告未經(jīng)許可,擅自使用原告發(fā)布的照片制作視頻,并在視頻中歪曲事實(shí)、侮辱原告及其女兒的行為,侵犯了原告的人格權(quán)、隱私權(quán)、名譽(yù)權(quán)等合法權(quán)益。同時(shí),被告在評(píng)論區(qū)對(duì)原告進(jìn)行侮辱和挑釁,進(jìn)一步加劇了原告的精神損害。關(guān)于爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),法院通過審核雙方證據(jù),認(rèn)為被告對(duì)原告進(jìn)行侮辱和侵權(quán)予以確認(rèn)。因此被告需在發(fā)布視頻言論平臺(tái)上向原告進(jìn)行賠禮道歉,并支持原告的精神損害賠償和經(jīng)濟(jì)損失(含合理維權(quán)費(fèi)用)賠償。
 
The central issue was whether B violated J's personality rights and, if found guilty, how B should bear civil responsibility. The court submitted relevant evidence, and B fully presented their defense during the trial. B claimed that the remarks were targeted at foreigners and should not be managed by a Chinese court. However, the court ruled that B’s unauthorized use of J’s photos and the derogatory content of the video violated J’s rights to personality, privacy, and reputation. After examining the evidence presented by both parties, the court affirmed the insult and infringement and supported J’s claims for an apology and compensation for emotional and economic damages.
 

 

律師建議

Lawyer’s Advice

通過這起網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任糾紛案,可以啟示我們:網(wǎng)絡(luò)并非法外之地,任何人在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上的行為都應(yīng)遵守法律法規(guī)和社會(huì)道德規(guī)范。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界中,我們同樣需要尊重他人的隱私權(quán)、名譽(yù)權(quán)等合法權(quán)益。為了避免這種不必要的麻煩,以下是一些建議,希望能幫到您:
①尊重他人隱私權(quán):在使用網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)發(fā)布內(nèi)容時(shí),應(yīng)尊重他人的隱私權(quán)。不要隨意使用或傳播未經(jīng)允許拍攝的照片、視頻特別是涉及未成年人的隱私內(nèi)容。
②審慎對(duì)待網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息:在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上看到涉及他人的內(nèi)容時(shí),不要盲目跟風(fēng)或評(píng)論,要審慎對(duì)待。不要隨意轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)或散播謠言,避免誤導(dǎo)他人或造成不必要的紛爭(zhēng)。
③遵守網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德和法律法規(guī):在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上發(fā)布內(nèi)容時(shí),應(yīng)遵守網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德和法律法規(guī),不得發(fā)布侮辱、攻擊他人的言論或視頻。對(duì)于侵犯他人權(quán)益的行為,應(yīng)及時(shí)刪除并道歉。
④保護(hù)個(gè)人信息安全:不要隨意在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上公開個(gè)人或家庭成員的照片、視頻等敏感信息,要保護(hù)個(gè)人信息安全,以免被不法分子利用。
⑤及時(shí)維權(quán):如果發(fā)現(xiàn)自己的權(quán)益受到侵犯,如照片、視頻被濫用或發(fā)布侮辱性言論等,應(yīng)及時(shí)采取措施維權(quán),如聯(lián)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)管理方或?qū)で蠓蓭椭?。同時(shí),要注意保留相關(guān)證據(jù),以便在需要時(shí)提供證據(jù)支持。
總而言之,面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)行為時(shí),我們應(yīng)該積極維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益,通過法律途徑尋求救濟(jì)。如果發(fā)生類似的情況可以聯(lián)系我們,我們有成功的案例為您最快追回?fù)p失。
 
This case of online infringement liability reminds us that the internet is not beyond the reach of law. All online activities must conform to legal and societal norms. It’s crucial to respect others' privacy and reputation online. To prevent such conflicts, here are some suggestions to help you:
①it’s advisable to respect privacy rights, especially when posting content involving minors;
②be prudent with information shared online;
③adhere to internet ethics and legal norms;
④protect personal data;
⑤seek timely legal help if your rights are infringed. Always keep evidence for potential legal support.
In summary, when facing online infringement, we should vigorously uphold our legal rights and seek remedies through legal channels. If you encounter similar issues, please contact us for immediate legal assistance to swiftly recover any losses.
 

          律師介紹          

 

趙寶蓮律師

 

北京市京師(深圳)律師事務(wù)所進(jìn)出口法律事務(wù)部主任,主要執(zhí)業(yè)方向?yàn)樯嫱庠V訟與仲裁、外商投資及國(guó)內(nèi)企業(yè)對(duì)外投資法律事務(wù)、外貿(mào)業(yè)務(wù)法務(wù)支撐。

 

電話: 18824679659

郵箱: Zbl3437045@126.com

 

Lylian ZhaoDirector of Import and Export Legal Affairs Department of Beijing Jingsh (Shenzhen) Law Firm, Master of Law. The main professional direction is foreign-related litigation and arbitration, foreign investment and domestic enterprises' foreign investment legal affairs, and foreign trade legal support.

 

Phone: 18824679659

Email: Zbl3437045@126.com

 

引言

Introduction

如今數(shù)字化時(shí)代,網(wǎng)絡(luò)成為信息傳播的主要渠道。與此同時(shí),網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)問題也日益凸顯,侵犯他人隱私權(quán)、名譽(yù)權(quán)等合法權(quán)益的現(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生,有些人甚至認(rèn)為在網(wǎng)上罵外籍人士不會(huì)引起侵權(quán)責(zé)任。京師律師代理為混血寶媽在國(guó)內(nèi)維權(quán)獲得廣州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院的支持。由此可見,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界中,無論是誰(shuí),都應(yīng)當(dāng)遵守網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德,無論被侵權(quán)人在國(guó)內(nèi)或者國(guó)內(nèi),尊重他人合法權(quán)益同樣重要。

 

In today's digital age, the internet has become a major medium for information dissemination. Alongside this development, issues of online infringement, such as violations of privacy and reputation rights, have become increasingly visible. Some even believe that insulting foreigners online does not entail legal responsibility. Our firm successfully represented a mom of a mixed-race baby, obtaining support from the Guangzhou Internet Court. This underscores that in the online world, everyone must adhere to ethical standards and respect legal rights, whether the victim is domestically or internationally located.

 

 

案情回顧

Case Review

原告J遠(yuǎn)嫁海外生有一女,混血寶寶因患有顱縫早閉的疾病,為尋醫(yī)原告在國(guó)內(nèi)抖音平臺(tái)上發(fā)布了孩子的照片和視頻。然而,被告B未經(jīng)許可,擅自將J發(fā)布的照片制作成視頻,并在視頻中配以侮辱性的文字和聲音,試圖以J女兒的形象為反面教材,證明混血兒丑陋愚蠢的觀點(diǎn)。此外,被告還在視頻和評(píng)論區(qū)發(fā)表“背叛民族的罪人” 等明顯帶有侮辱性、歧視性質(zhì)的言論,對(duì)J的婚姻及女兒作出負(fù)面的、缺少事實(shí)依據(jù)的評(píng)論,這些行為給J造成了嚴(yán)重的精神損害。在J與其通過抖音后臺(tái)溝通后,被告依然不知悔改,不刪除視頻,J不堪其辱提起訴訟。
 
The plaintiff,J, lives abroad and has a daughter who suffers from craniosynostosis. Seeking medical advice, J shared photos and videos of her daughter on the Chinese platform Douyin. Defendant B, without permission, repurposed J’s photos to produce a video, incorporating insulting text and voice commentary that portrayed J's daughter as a negative example to assert views of mixed-race individuals being unattractive and foolish. Moreover, B posted comments such as "traitor to the nation" , which are clearly insulting and discriminatory. These comments negatively and baselessly criticized J's marriage and daughter, inflicting severe emotional harm on J. Despite attempts to resolve the issue through Douyin’s administrative channels, B refused to delete the video, prompting J to file a lawsuit.
 

 

訴訟過程

Litigation Process

面對(duì)公然的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)和人身攻擊,J作為母親選擇站出來,用法律武器保護(hù)權(quán)益,她委托我所趙寶蓮律師在廣州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院提起訴訟。趙律師建議客戶首先將視頻證據(jù)通過權(quán)利衛(wèi)士取證平臺(tái)進(jìn)行保存,接著向抖音平臺(tái)發(fā)出律師函,要求將相關(guān)侵權(quán)視頻進(jìn)行下架。接著在啟動(dòng)訴訟的過程中, 通過律師調(diào)查令的方式向抖音平臺(tái)的調(diào)取到被告的身份信息及居住信息,將抖音平臺(tái)上中躲在虛擬世界中的鍵盤手拉到前臺(tái),要求他們面對(duì)自己行為造成的后果,最后獲得了令客戶滿意成果。這場(chǎng)維權(quán)的法律斗爭(zhēng)不僅是對(duì)個(gè)人權(quán)益的維護(hù),更是對(duì)所有母親守護(hù)孩子尊嚴(yán)的支持。
 
Confronted with blatant online infringement and personal attacks, J, as a mother, decided to stand up and protect her rights legally. Our lawyer, Zhao Baolian, advised J to first secure the video evidence through the Rights Guardian platform and then sent a legal notice to Douyin demanding the removal of the infringing video. The litigation process involved a court order to obtain B’s personal and residential information from Douyin, exposing the keyboard warrior to the real-world consequences of their online actions. And finally get a satisfactory result for customers.This legal battle was a defense of individual rights and an affirmation of the dignity of all mothers protecting their children.
 

 

案件結(jié)果

Case Outcome

一、被告B于本判決發(fā)生法律效力之日起十日內(nèi),在其抖音賬號(hào)發(fā)布道歉聲明向原告賠禮道歉,道歉內(nèi)容需經(jīng)本院審核,且不得設(shè)置查閱權(quán)限,持續(xù)時(shí)間不少于15日;
二、被告B于本判決發(fā)生法律效力之日起十日內(nèi)向原告支付精神損害賠償10000元;
三、被告B于本判決發(fā)生法律效力之日起十日內(nèi)向原告支付經(jīng)濟(jì)損失(含合理維權(quán)費(fèi)用)5000元。
 
1. Within ten days of the judgment becoming legally effective, defendant B must publish an apology on their Douyin account, subject to court review, which must remain accessible and unaltered for at least 15 days.
2. Within ten days of the judgment becoming legally effective, defendant B must pay J 10,000 yuan for emotional damages.
3. Within ten days of the judgment becoming legally effective, defendant B must pay J 5,000 yuan for economic losses, including reasonable costs of litigation.
 

 

本案焦點(diǎn)難點(diǎn)

Focus and Challenges

本案的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)為被告是否侵害了原告的一般人格權(quán)以及如被告構(gòu)成侵權(quán),應(yīng)如何承擔(dān)民事法律責(zé)任。在審理過程中,律師通過法院訴訟平臺(tái)提交了相關(guān)證據(jù),被告在庭審中充分發(fā)表了質(zhì)證意見。被告還提出他認(rèn)為原告和女兒都是外籍人士,他在網(wǎng)上的言論都是針對(duì)外國(guó)人,中國(guó)法院不應(yīng)該管。法院認(rèn)為,被告未經(jīng)許可,擅自使用原告發(fā)布的照片制作視頻,并在視頻中歪曲事實(shí)、侮辱原告及其女兒的行為,侵犯了原告的人格權(quán)、隱私權(quán)、名譽(yù)權(quán)等合法權(quán)益。同時(shí),被告在評(píng)論區(qū)對(duì)原告進(jìn)行侮辱和挑釁,進(jìn)一步加劇了原告的精神損害。關(guān)于爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),法院通過審核雙方證據(jù),認(rèn)為被告對(duì)原告進(jìn)行侮辱和侵權(quán)予以確認(rèn)。因此被告需在發(fā)布視頻言論平臺(tái)上向原告進(jìn)行賠禮道歉,并支持原告的精神損害賠償和經(jīng)濟(jì)損失(含合理維權(quán)費(fèi)用)賠償。
 
The central issue was whether B violated J's personality rights and, if found guilty, how B should bear civil responsibility. The court submitted relevant evidence, and B fully presented their defense during the trial. B claimed that the remarks were targeted at foreigners and should not be managed by a Chinese court. However, the court ruled that B’s unauthorized use of J’s photos and the derogatory content of the video violated J’s rights to personality, privacy, and reputation. After examining the evidence presented by both parties, the court affirmed the insult and infringement and supported J’s claims for an apology and compensation for emotional and economic damages.
 

 

律師建議

Lawyer’s Advice

通過這起網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任糾紛案,可以啟示我們:網(wǎng)絡(luò)并非法外之地,任何人在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上的行為都應(yīng)遵守法律法規(guī)和社會(huì)道德規(guī)范。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界中,我們同樣需要尊重他人的隱私權(quán)、名譽(yù)權(quán)等合法權(quán)益。為了避免這種不必要的麻煩,以下是一些建議,希望能幫到您:
①尊重他人隱私權(quán):在使用網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)發(fā)布內(nèi)容時(shí),應(yīng)尊重他人的隱私權(quán)。不要隨意使用或傳播未經(jīng)允許拍攝的照片、視頻特別是涉及未成年人的隱私內(nèi)容。
②審慎對(duì)待網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息:在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上看到涉及他人的內(nèi)容時(shí),不要盲目跟風(fēng)或評(píng)論,要審慎對(duì)待。不要隨意轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)或散播謠言,避免誤導(dǎo)他人或造成不必要的紛爭(zhēng)。
③遵守網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德和法律法規(guī):在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上發(fā)布內(nèi)容時(shí),應(yīng)遵守網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德和法律法規(guī),不得發(fā)布侮辱、攻擊他人的言論或視頻。對(duì)于侵犯他人權(quán)益的行為,應(yīng)及時(shí)刪除并道歉。
④保護(hù)個(gè)人信息安全:不要隨意在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上公開個(gè)人或家庭成員的照片、視頻等敏感信息,要保護(hù)個(gè)人信息安全,以免被不法分子利用。
⑤及時(shí)維權(quán):如果發(fā)現(xiàn)自己的權(quán)益受到侵犯,如照片、視頻被濫用或發(fā)布侮辱性言論等,應(yīng)及時(shí)采取措施維權(quán),如聯(lián)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)管理方或?qū)で蠓蓭椭?。同時(shí),要注意保留相關(guān)證據(jù),以便在需要時(shí)提供證據(jù)支持。
總而言之,面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)行為時(shí),我們應(yīng)該積極維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益,通過法律途徑尋求救濟(jì)。如果發(fā)生類似的情況可以聯(lián)系我們,我們有成功的案例為您最快追回?fù)p失。
 
This case of online infringement liability reminds us that the internet is not beyond the reach of law. All online activities must conform to legal and societal norms. It’s crucial to respect others' privacy and reputation online. To prevent such conflicts, here are some suggestions to help you:
①it’s advisable to respect privacy rights, especially when posting content involving minors;
②be prudent with information shared online;
③adhere to internet ethics and legal norms;
④protect personal data;
⑤seek timely legal help if your rights are infringed. Always keep evidence for potential legal support.
In summary, when facing online infringement, we should vigorously uphold our legal rights and seek remedies through legal channels. If you encounter similar issues, please contact us for immediate legal assistance to swiftly recover any losses.
 

          律師介紹          

 

圖片

趙寶蓮律師

 

北京市京師(深圳)律師事務(wù)所進(jìn)出口法律事務(wù)部主任,主要執(zhí)業(yè)方向?yàn)樯嫱庠V訟與仲裁、外商投資及國(guó)內(nèi)企業(yè)對(duì)外投資法律事務(wù)、外貿(mào)業(yè)務(wù)法務(wù)支撐。

 

電話: 18824679659

郵箱: Zbl3437045@126.com

 

Lylian ZhaoDirector of Import and Export Legal Affairs Department of Beijing Jingsh (Shenzhen) Law Firm, Master of Law. The main professional direction is foreign-related litigation and arbitration, foreign investment and domestic enterprises' foreign investment legal affairs, and foreign trade legal support.

 

Phone: 18824679659

Email: Zbl3437045@126.com

 

聯(lián)系我們
  • (+86) 0755-82796094
  • hr-shenzhen@jingsh.com
  • 廣東省深圳市福田區(qū)彩田路廣電文創(chuàng)中心五、七、九、十、十一樓
法律咨詢熱線:

400-166-6010

微信掃碼關(guān)注
京師深圳律所
微信掃碼咨詢
京師深圳律所
Copyright ? 2020 北京市京師(深圳)律師事務(wù)所 | 粵ICP備2020086911號(hào)-1